Sunday, October 6, 2013

An Invented People

In this chapter, Taylor introduces the idea that a “racial fantasyland” has been created which determines our perceptions of people based on their race. He notes that this racial fantasyland has been “officially sanctioned” and that just because it is officially sanctioned – meaning that it is the widely accepted way of seeing people who embody a particular race – does not mean that it is real; in fact, it is very far from “actual reality” and it has forced us into very problematic ways of thinking about people such as “inventing” people. This blog post will be an exploration of the implications of the racial fantasyland, of what it causes us to do, of what it means to “invent” people, and the implications of being able to create such an, in the words of Charles Mills, “invented delusional world”.

Before even thinking about how this racial fantasyland forces us into inventing people, it is important to note the fact that we can invent people. The fact that such distorted realities can be created, invented, is rather frightening, to say the least. This possibility to fall under such, for lack of a better word, lies, should serve as a reminder that our thoughts and perceptions, along with the stories through which we see the world, must be constantly subjected to analysis and skepticism. It should also serve as a reminder that we are often the embodiment of such thoughts and perceptions and stories because they are often being perpetuated and normalized (the fact that they are normalized is probably the scariest part of it all because often what is normal is seen as true and any attempt to stray from normal is incredibly difficult). So, with those two reminders – which can be summed up as the awareness that we are a part of the racial fantasyland – we can begin to explore how this racial fantasyland clouds people, living breathing people, behind an invention we create of them.

So how does this racial fantasyland play out? In simplest terms, it forces us to see certain things when we see people from a certain race. Because the racial fantasyland has invented blacks as being “essentially bound up with  their bodies” there has been incredible focus on Michelle Obama’s muscle and size. Because Latino immigrants have been invented as thieves, we don’t allow them into “our” country (our is in quotations because the reasons for it being our country are arbitrary and embedded in this racial fantasyland). It is clear in these cases that our invention of the identities people has enormous influence on how we treat them. If they were seen as they are, not as their invented selves, perhaps Latino immigration would be addressed in a different matter, and perhaps Michelle Obama, the person, won’t be reduced to her physical appearance.

It is clear, then, that these practices are indeed frightening. Our inventions of people greatly affect how we treat them and interact with them. The ease with which these inventions are created and spread is also grounds for much concern. It reveals the strength of such social pressures and ideologies in determining how we see people (and therefore how we treat them). Awareness of the racial fantasyland and the forces behind its creation and perpetuation lead us to a set of new questions. How can we escape it? And where are we escaping to?


Although it is question of which I have not arrived at the answer (and I’m not so sure anyone can arrive at the answer), it is a crucial question to ask and to explore. Charles Mills points out that the racial fantasyland, the “officially sanctioned reality”, is divergent from “actual reality”. Of course, the question that ensues is “what is the actual reality through which we should see people?” I suppose the actual reality is not a particular way of seeing people within a racial group, of seeing blacks as criminals, nor as seeing them as angels. Switching the perception of blacks from a negative one to a positive one still clouds them; it is still an invention of them. I suppose then that seeing the actual reality consists of not inventing people’s identity but to see them as people.